United States v. Nastro

In United States v Crusoe, 3 USCMA *377793, 14 CMR 211, this Court pointed out that if there is any un certainty in the convening authority’s action, we can look to the post-trial review of the Staff Judge Advocate to determine his meaning. See also United States v Walters, 4 USCMA 617, 16 CMR 191. Assuming that the language of the convening authority’s action here is not clear, the review of his legal officer makes it absolutely certain that the convening authority intended to approve the offense of indecent liberties with a child under the age of sixteen years with the intent to gratify his…