United States v. Padilla
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Paul W. BROsman, Judge:
This case is before us on petition for review granted that we might consider a substantial question of double jeopardy raised by the accused persons. Involved here are two trials for the same offense, the second of which has resulted in this appeal. Understanding of the issue involved requires that we set out chronologically and in detail the steps leading to, and the results of, both trials.
On May 1, 1951, petitioners, Jacobs and Padilla, were allegedly involved in an incident wherein several German civilians were assaulted by a group of American…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Grafton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Dynes v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
- United States v. VanderpoolUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. DeanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.