Legal Opinion

Rose v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1945No. 10445PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

Benjamin Rose, Louis Vitagliano, and three others were tried and convicted in the district court of violating § 88, Title 18 U.S.C.A. The indictment alleged that they “unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly, corruptly, fraudulently and feloniously” engaged in a conspiracy, beginning about December 12, 1941, and continuing until the return of the indictment, “to commit offenses against the United States, that is to say, to sell, trade, lease, ship and transfer new rubber tires, casings, and tubes to consumers and other persons in violation of the statute, executive orders,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. United States v. HessSupreme Court of the United States · 1888

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Kempe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
  3. Hadder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API