Legal Opinion
Pasadena Research Laboratories, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 16, 1948No. 11690PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
The appellants were found guilty on five counts of an information charging violations of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 301 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act, in that they “did * * * unlawfully cause to be introduced * * * into interstate commerce” adulterated and misbranded drugs. The corporate appellant was fined $3,000, and the appellant Bavouset was placed on five years’ probation, imposition of sentence upon him having been suspended.
The trial was without a jury, a jury trial and special findings of fact having been specifically…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- International Shoe Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Donaldson v. Read Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Albert Lopez Gallego v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Martin Cardenas, A/K/A Raul RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- William J. Gass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Standard Oil Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.