Legal Opinion
People v. Llamas
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 1991No. H007264PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.—
Introduction
After the denial of his motion to suppress evidence under Penal Code section 1538.5, defendant pled guilty to possession of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and to being under the influence of cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11550). The court ordered three years of formal probation.
Defendant appeals, claiming that the entry and search of defendant’s motel room was based on a co-occupant’s involuntary consent. For the reasons stated below, we will affirm the trial court’s ruling.
Statement of the Facts
The motion to suppress evidence was submitted…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. SalvucciSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. MadridCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- People v. ByersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. BadgettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995