Legal Opinion

People v. Byers

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 2016No. G051068PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

The court denied defendant David Shea Byers’s motion to suppress evidence. (Pen. Code, § 1538.5.) Defendant then pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351; count 1) and misdemeanor possession of nitrous oxide for the purpose of intoxication (§ 381b; count 2). The court imposed the upper term of four years on count 1, stayed sentence on count 2 under section 654, and then designated a split sentence of one year in jail followed by three years of mandatory supervision under section 1170, subdivision (h)(5).

On appeal, defendant contends law…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Bac Tieng Nguyen, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. People v. Guyton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. People v. GuytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. People v. NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. People v. Silva CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API