United States v. Salvucci
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
Relying on Jones v. United States, 362 U. S. 257 (1960), the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that since respondents were charged with crimes of possession, they were *85entitled to claim “automatic standing” to challenge the legality of the search which produced the evidence against them, without regard to whether they had an expectation of privacy in the premises searched. 599 F. 2d 1094 (1979). Today we hold that defendants charged with crimes of possession may only claim the benefits of the exclusionary rule if their own Fourth Amendment rights have in fact been violated. The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,735 opinions
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Soldal v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
1,730 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.