Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Aguilar

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 15, 1996No. H014132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

After his motion to suppress was denied, Jaime Aguilar pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine for sale while armed with a firearm (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351; Pen. Code, § 12022, subd. (c)); possessing marijuana for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11359) and possessing cocaine base for sale while armed with a firearm (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.5). Aguilar also admitted having a prior conviction. On appeal, Aguilar argues that his motion to suppress should have been granted. We will affirm.

Facts and Procedural Background

On April 13, 1994, about 10:40 p.m., members of the R.E.D.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. RatliffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. MirandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. MaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. People v. HoxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API