Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Truette

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 2, 1984No. Misc. (BV) No. 33, September Term, 1982PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Whiteman Samuel Truette III, alleging numerous violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, to Judge James M. Rea of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting an evidentiary hearing, Judge Rea filed detailed findings as follows:

“The Court finds, as a matter of fact, that Mr. Truette is a member of the Maryland Bar and that he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FinlaysonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WillemainCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. NothsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Matter of Discipline of SimonsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API