Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDeapbau, J.
To plaintiff’s first amended complaint for declaratory relief, defendants interposed a demurrer, a motion to strike and a motion to dismiss. The latter motion was made upon the ground “that the declaratory relief sought is neither necessary nor proper at the time under all the circumstances.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 1061.) Such motion was granted. The demurrer and motion to strike were ordered off calendar.
From the judgment of dismissal which followed, plaintiff appeals.
In his opening brief, appellant points out that this action in declaratory relief is the fourth proceeding between the parties…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lord v. GarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Kessloff v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- San Bernardino Fire & Police Protective League v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Foster v. Masters Pontiac Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- LePage v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.