State v. Vallin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Before Walters, Chief Justice, and Balmer, Nakamoto, Flynn, Duncan, Nelson, and Garrett, Justices.**
*414**297Under Article IV, section 33, of the Oregon Constitution, the legislature may not reduce a criminal sentence that was "approved by the people" through the initiative or referendum process by a simple majority vote, but must garner a two-thirds majority in both houses.1 In this certified appeal, we must determine whether that constitutional rule applies to House Bill (H.B.) 3078 (2017), which recently was enacted by a simple majority in the legislature and which reduces certain statutory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Carson v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Elk Creek Management Co. v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SavinskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. AguileraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
- Linn Cnty. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. VallinOregon Supreme Court · 2019