Legal Opinion

State v. Vallin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2019No. CC 17CR35704 (CA A167097) (SC S065957)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before Walters, Chief Justice, and Balmer, Nakamoto, Flynn, Duncan, Nelson, and Garrett, Justices.**

*414**297Under Article IV, section 33, of the Oregon Constitution, the legislature may not reduce a criminal sentence that was "approved by the people" through the initiative or referendum process by a simple majority vote, but must garner a two-thirds majority in both houses.1 In this certified appeal, we must determine whether that constitutional rule applies to House Bill (H.B.) 3078 (2017), which recently was enacted by a simple majority in the legislature and which reduces certain statutory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Carson v. KozerOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Martin v. City of TigardOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Elk Creek Management Co. v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. EdmondsOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. SavinskiyOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. AguileraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. Linn Cnty. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. VallinOregon Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API