Legal Opinion

Elk Creek Management Co. v. Gilbert

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2013No. CC M09072786; CA A143348; SC S060187PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

ORS 90.385 prohibits a landlord from “retaliating] by” serving notice to terminate a tenancy after the tenant has made a complaint that is in good faith and related to the tenancy.1 In this case, we conclude that, to prove retaliation under ORS 90.385, a tenant must establish that the landlord served the notice of termination because of the tenant’s complaint. The tenant need not prove, in addition, that the complaint caused the landlord actual or perceived injury or that the landlord intended to cause the tenant equivalent injury in return. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Yvonne C. Edwards v. Nathan HabibCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  2. LaCasse v. OwenJackson County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  3. Eddy v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. MeiserOregon Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API