Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Mirlisena v. Hamilton County Board of Elections
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1993No. 93-1435PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
At an election held in the city of Cincinnati on November 5, 1991, electors voted to approve Issues 4 and 5 as amendments to the Cincinnati City Charter. These issues appeared on the ballot in the following form:
Issue 4
“Shall the proposed amendment to the Charter of the City of Cincinnati to provide that the people shall have the right to nominate, vote for and elect any citizen who is registered to vote in the city to be a member of council without restriction relating to the citizen’s prior experience as a member of council by adding new Section 1A to Article IX be approved?” (Emphasis…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Citizens Against Rent Control/Coalition for Fair Housing v. City of BerkeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- City of South Euclid v. JemisonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Hinkle v. Franklin County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Livingston v. ClawsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Huebner v. West Jefferson Village CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Deiter v. McGuireOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. King v. Summit County CouncilOhio Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.