Legal Opinion
Broderson v. Marzall
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided November 23, 1951No. 10631_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent case. The application was denied by the Patent Office. A complaint was filed in the District Court under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes.1 Trial was had, and the District Court rendered an opinion, made findings of fact, announced conclusions of law, and entered judgment dismissing the complaint. The applicant appealed.
The applicant claims a patent for a method of operating a four-stroke-cycle Otto internal combustion engine. The patent was denied, by both the Patent Office and the District Court, upon the ground that no invention was shown in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Poulsen v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
3Cited by6 opinions
- Emery P. Miller and Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Sinclair Weeks, Secretary of Commerce, and Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Edward M. Allen, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation v. Orlando Leonard Bertorelli, J. M. Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Marzall, Commissioner of Patents v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Carleton v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.