Legal Opinion
Emery P. Miller and Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp. v. Sinclair Weeks, Secretary of Commerce, and Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 15, 1955No. 12738PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
This is a patent case under Rev.Stat. § 4915 (1875). 1 The District Court, after hearing, ruled that certain process claims did not constitute invention over prior art, and entered judgment dismissing the complaint.
Emery P. Miller, one of the plaintiffs, filed application for letters patent in the United States Patent Office entitled “Apparatus & Method of Coating,” said application being Serial No. 626,631 in the Patent Office. Plaintiff, Ransburg Electro-Coating Corp., is the assignee of the application.
The Examiner in charge of the application allowed all of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Abbott v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. Montedison, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Edward M. Allen, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation v. Orlando Leonard Bertorelli, J. M. Huber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. MontedisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981