Legal Opinion

Carleton v. Watson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 3, 1957No. Civ. A. 4970-55Published

1Opinion of the Court

KEECH, District Judge..

This is an action to compel issuance of a patent for a portable hydraulic power device to control the operation of a vertical stopper in the nozzle of a bottom-pouring ladle for pouring molten metal, specifically, molten steel. By means of applicant’s device the stopper may be raised and lowered, or stopped instantaneously -and accurately at any de-; sired position, by use of a push button control at the end of a flexible cable, which affords the operator a hitherto unknown delicacy of control, yet permits him to stand out of danger, away from the ladle, and also to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Levin v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  5. Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API