Legal Opinion
Edward M. Allen, Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company, Columbia-Southern Chemical Corporation v. Orlando Leonard Bertorelli, J. M. Huber Corporation
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 16, 1957No. 13502_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
’BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellants (plaintiffs) filed suit in the District Court pursuant to 35 U. S.C. § 146, to direct the Commissioner of Patents to issue to appellant Allen and his assignee a patent covering a method of preparing a pigment product. 1
Appellant Allen and appellee Bertorelli filed their applications for patent within a few days of each other in 1947. Ber-torelli was the first to file, and he was also accorded the benefit of an application filed by him on August 6, 1946. Interference being declared by the Commissioner of Patents, Allen, because of Bertorelli’s earlier…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Standard Oil Development Co. v. Marzall, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- L-O-F Glass Fibers Company and Everett J. Cook v. Robert C. Watson, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Birmingham v. RandallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. Monsanto Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Henry B. Deane and Kathleen P. Deane v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957