Marzall, Commissioner of Patents v. Switzer
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellees Switzer and Ward brought a civil action in the District Court under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 1 praying that the Commissioner of Patents be authorized and directed to issue a patent to them. After a trial the court rendered a memorandum opinion, 2 made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment for the plaintiffs. The Commissioner appealed.
The claims of the patent concern a process of dyeing fabrics to obtain a daylight fluorescence, and a composition of matter comprising fabrics so treated. The ordinary dyeing of fabrics is,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
3Cited by2 opinions
- Texas-Miller Hat Corp. v. Switzer Bros., Inc. Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Texas-Miller Hat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- Texas-Miller Hat Corp. v. Switzer Bros., Inc. Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Texas-Miller Hat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953