Legal Opinion

Marzall, Commissioner of Patents v. Switzer

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 26, 1952No. 10985_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellees Switzer and Ward brought a civil action in the District Court under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes, 1 praying that the Commissioner of Patents be authorized and directed to issue a patent to them. After a trial the court rendered a memorandum opinion, 2 made findings of fact and conclusions of law, and entered judgment for the plaintiffs. The Commissioner appealed.

The claims of the patent concern a process of dyeing fabrics to obtain a daylight fluorescence, and a composition of matter comprising fabrics so treated. The ordinary dyeing of fabrics is,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Broderson v. MarzallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas-Miller Hat Corp. v. Switzer Bros., Inc. Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Texas-Miller Hat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Texas-Miller Hat Corp. v. Switzer Bros., Inc. Switzer Bros., Inc. v. Texas-Miller Hat Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API