Legal Opinion

Daum v. Conley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1899No. 3819PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of La Plata County.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbeet

On November 27, 1894, under the statutes relating to the adjudication of water rights, proceedings were instituted in the district court of La Plata county for the purpose of adjudicating such rights in that part of water district No. 80 taking water from Elbert creek. The referee appointed heard the evidence and reported the same with his findings of fact and a decree fixing the respective priorities of the parties taking water from that stream. Subsequently, a time was designated by the judge within which exceptions to such report, findings and decree should be filed. Within that time Peter…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. Arnett v. LinhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  3. McDonald v. LannenMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Travelers Insurance v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  5. Chicago Dock Co. v. KinzieIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lazy Dog Ranch v. Telluray Ranch Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. East Ridge of Fort Collins, LLC v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Bessemer Irrigating Ditch Co. v. WoolleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1904
  4. Featherman v. HennessyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Vaught v. PettyjohnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API