Legal Opinion

Featherman v. Hennessy

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1911No. 2,885PublishedCited by 23 opinions

• Appeal from District Court, Granite County; Geo. B. Winston, Judge. Action by John A. Featherman and others against D. W. Hennessy and others. From a judgment establishing the relative water rights of the defendants James McGowan and the Oro y Plata Mining Company, and an order denying him a new trial, McGowan appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Brantly

This action was brought by John A. Featherman and five other plaintiffs against appellant James McGowan, the respond*537ent Oro y Plata Mining Company, and thirty-five other defendants, to obtain a decree determining the respective rights of the parties to the nse of the water flowing in Flint creek, in Granite county. All of the defendants answered, setting forth the rights claimed by them, and alleging priority of appropriation and use of specific quantities of water as against the plaintiffs, as well as against each other. Under a stipulation signed by the attorneys of all the parties, all…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Book v. Justice Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1893
  2. Jackson v. StanfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bullerdick v. HermsmeyerMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Smith v. DuffMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. McDonald v. LannenMontana Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Enterprise Irrigation District v. Tri-State Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Havre Irrigation Co. v. MajerusMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Thomas v. BallMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Shammel v. VoglMontana Supreme Court · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API