Watoshina Compton v. Countrywide Financial Corp
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Watoshina Lynn Compton appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claim under section 480-2 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, which authorizes consumers to “bring an action based upon unfair or deceptive acts or practices.” Haw.Rev.Stat. § 480-2(d) (referred to herein as a UDAP claim). Because Compton’s complaint adequately alleges that unfair and deceptive acts by Bank of America Corporation (BAC) 1 caused an injury resulting in damages, we reverse the district court.
I
We assume the following facts taken from the complaint are true for the purpose of our review.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hungate v. Law Office of David B. RosenHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SalvacionHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
- City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Wieck v. CIT Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.