Legal Opinion

Watoshina Compton v. Countrywide Financial Corp

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2014No. 11-17158PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

Watoshina Lynn Compton appeals the district court’s dismissal of her claim under section 480-2 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes, which authorizes consumers to “bring an action based upon unfair or deceptive acts or practices.” Haw.Rev.Stat. § 480-2(d) (referred to herein as a UDAP claim). Because Compton’s complaint adequately alleges that unfair and deceptive acts by Bank of America Corporation (BAC) 1 caused an injury resulting in damages, we reverse the district court.

I

We assume the following facts taken from the complaint are true for the purpose of our review.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Metzler Investment GMBH v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Nymark v. Heart Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hungate v. Law Office of David B. RosenHawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Fero v. Excellus Health Plain, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2017
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. SalvacionHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. Wieck v. CIT Grp., Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API