Legal Opinion

Hungate v. Law Office of David B. Rosen

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 2017No. SCAP-13-00005234PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WILSON, J.

This case concerns a non-judicial foreclosure conducted pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 667 Part I (Supp. 2008), which was repealed by the state legislature on June 28, 2012 by Act 182. Plaintiff-Appellant Russell L. Hungate (Hungate) appeals the Circuit Court of the First Circuit’s (circuit court) order granting Defendants-Appel-lees David B. Rosen’s and his law office’s (collectively, Rosen) motion to dismiss the complaint. Hungate also appeals the circuit court’s order granting Defendant-Appellee Deutsche Bank National Trust Company’s (Deutsche…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. KekaHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Best Place, Inc. v. Penn America Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Heejoon Chung v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
  2. Amina v. WMC Fin. Co.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
  3. Maeda v. Pinnacle Foods Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  4. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Cottam v. IHC Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API