Legal Opinion
Hillside Water Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1938No. L. A. 15646PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
On May 9, 1931, the plaintiff Hillside Water Company, a corporation, filed a complaint in the Superior Court in and for the County of Inyo, seeking to enjoin the defendants, City of Los Angeles, and its Board of Water and Power Commissioners from “flowing, pumping, or otherwise exporting any of the waters” from any of the defendants’ water wells located on the defendants’ lands overlying the underground basin known as the Bishop-Big Pine Basin in Inyo County, and from diverting and transporting any of the waters from said basin to any place or land not overlying said basin.
The Bishop-Big Pine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Herminghaus v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Collier v. Merced Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Lodi v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Joslin v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Loma Portal Civic Club v. American Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.