Legal Opinion

Nielson v. Hermansen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1946No. 6861PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Justice.

Complaint sets forth two causes of action: the first for breach of warranty in sale of seed wheat; the second for the loss of an eight acre planting of alfalfa which failed to grow because the wheat, purchased for use as a nurse crop to the alfalfa was not suitable for that purpose. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant on both causes of action. From this ruling and order, and the verdict thereon plaintiff appeals.(1) Is there sufficient evidence of a warranty to raise a question for determination by the jury?

On a motion by defendant for a directed verdict in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anglo-California Trust Co. v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Stringfellow v. Botterill Auto Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Summers v. Provo Foundry & Machine Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
  4. In Re Lowe's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Jorgensen v. Gessell Pressed Brick Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Park v. Moorman Mfg. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Terry v. MooreWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Street v. Fourth Judicial Dist. Court, Utah Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API