Legal Opinion

Park v. Moorman Mfg. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1952No. 7456PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Respondent is a poutlryman who raises chickens principally for their egg production. His plant is divided by a highway known as Redwood Road which causes about half of his coops to lie on the east side of the highway and the other half to lie on the west side of the highway. At the time of respondent’s transactions with appellant, respondent had approximately 3,500 hens on the west side of the road and about 2,850 hens on the east side. These chickens were being fed a product known as “Larro” under a feeding plan known as the “Mash” method.

Appellant is a mid-western feed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. S.A. Gerrard Co., Inc. v. FrickerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Metcalf v. MellenUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Egelhoff v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Gilwee v. Pabst Brewing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Nielson v. HermansenUtah Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Long v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  2. FRIGALIMENT IMPORTING CO., LTD. v. BNS International Sales Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
  3. State v. StanleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brown v. Globe Laboratories, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Reynolds v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API