Legal Opinion

Stringfellow v. Botterill Auto Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1923No. 4017PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■WEBER, C. J;

On February 1, 1922, plaintiff purchased a five-passenger Esses touring car of defendant for $1,375, and entered into *58a written contract of purchase with defendant in which the car was described as a 1922 model. At the same time a bill óf sale was delivered to plaintiff, also describing the car as a 1922 model. Plaintiff paid part cash, and continued paying’ the installments as they became due, until the following July; the last payment being made under protest, he having ascertained that the car was a 1921 and not a 1922 model. Plaintiff thereupon brought suit in the district…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kardis v. BarrereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Nielson v. HermansenUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Tuscaloosa Truck & Tractor Co. v. StewartAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Balcer Bros. Motor Coach Co. v. NiemannMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API