Stringfellow v. Botterill Auto Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■WEBER, C. J;
On February 1, 1922, plaintiff purchased a five-passenger Esses touring car of defendant for $1,375, and entered into *58a written contract of purchase with defendant in which the car was described as a 1922 model. At the same time a bill óf sale was delivered to plaintiff, also describing the car as a 1922 model. Plaintiff paid part cash, and continued paying’ the installments as they became due, until the following July; the last payment being made under protest, he having ascertained that the car was a 1921 and not a 1922 model. Plaintiff thereupon brought suit in the district…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kardis v. BarrereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Nielson v. HermansenUtah Supreme Court · 1946
- Foutty v. Chalmax Sales Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
- Tuscaloosa Truck & Tractor Co. v. StewartAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
- Balcer Bros. Motor Coach Co. v. NiemannMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.