Legal Opinion
Damora v. Christ-Janer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1981PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff brought this action seeking to recover the value of services performed pursuant to an oral agreement and for a breach of an oral agreement with the defendant. From the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has appealed.
The trial court could have reasonably found the following: The plaintiff is a highly respected architectural photographer, and the defendant is a highly regarded architect. At the time of this lawsuit the two had known and intermittently worked with each other for twenty-five years.
Prior to 1976, the defendant had designed the renovation of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Smith v. . DotterweichNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Web Press Services Corp. v. New London Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Petereit v. S.B. Thomas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Thompson & Peck, Inc. v. Harbor Marine Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- HLO Land Ownership Associates Ltd. Partnership v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.