Savings Bank of New London v. Santaniello
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The principal question involved in this appeal is whether a defendant who files a cross-complaint in a foreclosure action has an absolute right to a jury trial under the circumstances here disclosed.
The pleadings and judgment in the case cover thirty-five-pages of the printed record but-are not as complicated as this statement would indicate. The substi tuted complaint claimed foreclosure of two mortgages, the notes which these mortgages secured being signed by the named defendant, hereafter referred to as the defendant. In her answer the defendant denied the debt and filed a cross-complaint…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lindsay v. Jackson & McJimpseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Schaefer v. O. K. Tool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Berry v. Hartford National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Meriden Savings Bank v. McCormackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Gaudio v. GaudioConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Johnson v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owners Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Harada v. BurnsHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Franchi v. Farmholme, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.