Legal Opinion

Burnett v. Birmingham Board of Education

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided August 15, 1994No. 2:94-cv-01542PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

Following defendants’ removal of the above-entitled case from the Circuit Court of Jefferson County pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343, upon the allegation that a federal question under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is presented, plaintiffs timely filed a motion to remand, invoking 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) and asserting that because state law predominates the entire “matter” should be remanded.

Plaintiffs, Emma Burnett, et al., are employees of defendant, Birmingham Board of Education. Plaintiffs’ state court complaint consisted of a petition for writ of mandamus…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. DeBiaseDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. Alexander by Alexander v. Goldome Credit Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1991
  3. Holland v. World Omni Leasing, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991
  4. Kabealo v. DavisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
  5. Martin v. Drummond Coal Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kisor v. CollinsDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2004
  2. Lujan v. Earthgrains Baking Companies, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  3. Palivos v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. City of Mobile, In Re:Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. City of Mobile, In Re:Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API