Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of Mobile, In Re:

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 31, 1996No. 95-6878Published

1DissentBirch, Circuit Judge

Because I believe that the district court correctly remanded the entire underlying case to state court, albeit under the wrong reasoning and statutory authority, I dissent. I agree with the majority that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) was the improper basis to support remand of the entire underlying case, which includes a

42 U.S.C. § 1983

claim, because section 1367(c) accords a district court discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in definitive situations.1 I disagree, however, with the majority and the district court's dismissal of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) as the basis for…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API