City of Mobile, In Re:
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentBirch, Circuit Judge
Because I believe that the district court correctly remanded the entire underlying case to state court, albeit under the wrong reasoning and statutory authority, I dissent. I agree with the majority that 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) was the improper basis to support remand of the entire underlying case, which includes a
42 U.S.C. § 1983
claim, because section 1367(c) accords a district court discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims in definitive situations.1 I disagree, however, with the majority and the district court's dismissal of 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c) as the basis for…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.