Legal Opinion

Moore v. DeBiase

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1991No. Civ. A. 91-1423PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

Introduction

This is an action brought by plaintiffs Robert Moore (“Moore”) and Deborah Moore (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) against Joseph F. DeBiase (“DeBiase”), John Gibney (“Gibney”), Joseph Cummins (“Cummins”), Louis Cippola (“Cippola”), Thomas DeNapoli (“DeNapoli”), Philip Ventriglia (“Ventriglia”), Patrick Robinson (“Robinson”), Cheryl O’Neill (“O’Neill”), the Borough of Dunellen (“Dunellen”) and the Dunellen Police Department (the “Police Department”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Currently before the court is the motion of Plaintiffs to remand this…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. No. 94-3025Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Borough of West Mifflin v. LancasterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Greg and Paige Eastus v. Blue Bell Creameries, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. Padilla v. City of SaginawDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  5. Frederick J. Diven v. Amalgamated Transit Union International and Local 689, Amalgamated Transit UnionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API