Legal Opinion

Williams v. North Carolina State Board of Education

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 1, 1974No. 77PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Both plaintiffs and defendants agree that since this case involves the application of North Carolina law to deeds made and recorded prior to 1885, North Carolina’s present recordation statute — the Connor Act — is not controlling. See . 1885 Laws of North Carolina, chapter 147, now codified as G.S. 47-18.,

The trial court in its judgment found that the deed from Allison to Baker under which defendants claim through mesne conveyances was dated 17 April 1797, was delivered no later than 17 July 1797, but was not recorded until 19 November 1798. Plaintiffs .first contend that even…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Koontz v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Corbin v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Drake v. HanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Taylor v. AbernethyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Garrison v. BlakeneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Den-Mark Construction, Inc. v. Wachovia Bank National Ass'n (In Re Den-Mark Construction, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API