Corbin v. Langdon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
Plaintiff has only one assignment of error based on the only exception appearing' of record. The exception is to the court’s finding “as a fact that there is no genuine issue of fact to be submitted to the trial court in connection with plaintiff’s claim asserted and (sic) the complaint filed herein.”
Plaintiff first argues that the court failed to consider “parol evidence which is admissible as completing and defining a vague contract.” We do not argue with the principles of law espoused by plaintiff. He relies on Root v. Insurance Co., 272 N.C. 580, 583, 158 S.E. 2d 829 (1967),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Weyerhaeuser Company v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Sell Ex Rel. Bason v. HotchkissSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Parks v. Venters Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Robertson v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Routh v. Snap-On Tools Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Cater v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Minor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Mosely v. WAM, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.