Legal Opinion

Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2002No. CV-02-0020-CQPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

¶ 1 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question to this court: “Does A.R.S. § 12-133 authorize a system of compulsory participation of attorneys in the mandatory arbitration system?”

¶2 To respond, we turn to the express language of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 12-133 (Supp.2001). Subsection (A) states:

The superior court, by rule of court, shall do both of the following:

1. Establish jurisdictional limits of not to exceed fifty thousand dollars for submission of disputes to arbitration.

2. Require arbitration in all cases which are filed in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Leyva v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Leyva v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. TEMEN v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Stastny v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API