Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VOSS, Judge.
¶ 1 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals certified the following question to this court: “Does A.R.S. § 12-133 authorize a system of compulsory participation of attorneys in the mandatory arbitration system?”
¶2 To respond, we turn to the express language of Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) § 12-133 (Supp.2001). Subsection (A) states:
The superior court, by rule of court, shall do both of the following:
1. Establish jurisdictional limits of not to exceed fifty thousand dollars for submission of disputes to arbitration.
2. Require arbitration in all cases which are filed in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Bellotti v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elkins v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Western Helicopter Services, Inc. v. Rogerson Aircraft Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme CourtArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Leyva v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Leyva v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- TEMEN v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
- Stastny v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.