Legal Opinion

Leyva v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 2007No. 06-233PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] Mr. Leyva appeals his conviction on two felony counts, one for burglary and one for third offense illegal possession of a controlled substance. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Mr. Leyva and the State agree on the two issues to be resolved in this case, and we state them as follows:

1. Did the district court improperly withdraw its acceptance of Mr. Leyva's guilty plea?

2. Did the district court err in allowing evidence of uncharged misconduct to be admitted at trial?

FACTS

[13] On September 8, 2005, Rawlins police received a phone call from Kelly King, who reported that a television set…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Brewer v. StarcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Reay v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Foster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Dallas Clem Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Rolle v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API