TEMEN v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶1] Appellant, Bryan Temen (Temen), was convicted of robbery and misdemeanor credit card fraud. He appeals those convictions asserting that the district court erred in allowing amendment of the information during trial. Temen was originally charged with felony credit card fraud, but the evidence presented at trial fell short of the $1,000.00 felony level, and the district court permitted amendment of the information to the misdemeanor level. In addition, Temen asserts that the district court erred in admitting prior bad acts evidence under W.R.E. 404(b). We will affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Sanville v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Bromley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Mowery v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
- Garnica v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011