Legal Opinion

TEMEN v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2009No. S-08-0071PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Bryan Temen (Temen), was convicted of robbery and misdemeanor credit card fraud. He appeals those convictions asserting that the district court erred in allowing amendment of the information during trial. Temen was originally charged with felony credit card fraud, but the evidence presented at trial fell short of the $1,000.00 felony level, and the district court permitted amendment of the information to the misdemeanor level. In addition, Temen asserts that the district court erred in admitting prior bad acts evidence under W.R.E. 404(b). We will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sanville v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Vigil v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Bromley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rodriguez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Mowery v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Garnica v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API