Legal Opinion

Elkins v. Moreno

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 19, 1978No. 77-154PublishedCited by 193 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan

Respondents, representing a class of nonimmigrant alien residents of Maryland,1 brought this action against the University of Maryland2 and its President, petitioner Elkins, alleging that the University’s failure to grant respondents “in-state” status for tuition purposes violated various federal laws,3 the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Supremacy Clause. The District Court held for respondents on the ground that the University’s procedures for determining in-state status violated principles established in Vlandis v. Kline, 412 U. S. 441 (1973),…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by193 opinions

  1. Carney v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Toll v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Minnesota Voters Alliance v. ManskySupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Alfred Brown, William King and Willie James Mallett, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Robert R. Sibley, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1989

188 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API