Scheehle v. Justices of the Supreme Court
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge. *
¶ 1 The United States District Court for the District of Arizona has asked us whether this Court “can promulgate court rules mandating experienced attorneys to serve as arbitrators in light of the statutory language of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-133 (2000) authorizing only voluntary service?” We have jurisdiction to decide the certified question pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-1861 (2001). 1
¶ 2 We hold that this Court has authority to promulgate a court rule authorizing the superior courts in each county of this state to require active members of the state bar…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. 30.64 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in Klickitat County, State of Washington, and James StarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Valerie M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
- Segura v. CunananCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Hancock v. BisnarArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Claudia Duff v. Hon. lee/tucson PoliceArizona Supreme Court · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.