Legal Opinion

Gerard v. Mercer

District Court, D. Montana

Decided June 7, 1945No. 525PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRAY, District Judge.

Motions to dismiss the complaint in the above entitled cause on the part of the several defendants therein named are now before the Court for consideration, on briefs submitted by counsel for the respective parties.

Serious questions have been raised and ably presented by counsel for both sides, requiring examination by the Court of many statutes and authorities to determine the merits of the several obj ections to the sufficiency of the complaint to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Cases embracing similar problems have come before the courts on other…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. United States v. RickertSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Matter of HeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Felix v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hankinson v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Sun-X Glass Tinting of Mid-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Sun-X International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
  3. Merrill v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Lewis v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sinclair v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API