In re the Recall of Pearsall-Stipek
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, C.J.
In these two consolidated cases, Mark Bennett appeals the Superior Court’s dismissals of his recall petitions against the Pierce County Auditor, Cathy Pearsall-Stipek. Mr. Bennett’s first recall petition makes the same charges based on the same facts as those brought in earlier recall petitions by another voter. The trial court dismissed these charges as barred by res judicata. We agree and affirm. Mr. Bennett’s second recall petition was dismissed for insufficiency. Additionally, the trial court found that the petition was frivolous and advanced without *259reasonable cause and ordered Mr.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of TacomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Rains v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Chandler v. OttoWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Hsu Ying Li v. TangWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. KottsickWashington Supreme Court · 1976
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re the Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Recall of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Rogerson Hiller Corp. v. Port of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- In Re the Election Contest Filed by CodayWashington Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.