Legal Opinion
In Re the Election Contest Filed by Coday
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 9, 2006No. 76480-8, 76541-3, 76500-6, 76479-4PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
fl Four election contests challenging the results of the 2004 governor’s election were filed in this court by individual electors. These contestants rely on various grounds to challenge the results of the election. We conclude that three of these contests, those filed by Arthur Coday, Jr., Michael J. Goodall, and Daniel P. Stevens, fail to state a cognizable claim under the election contest statute. The fourth of these contests, that filed by Suzanne D. Karr, is identical to Borders v. King County, No. 05-2-00027-3 (Chelan County Super. Ct., Wash. June 24, 2005), which was decided in Chelan…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Loveridge v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Matter of Pearsall-StipekWashington Supreme Court · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Arlington v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- City of Arlington v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Stevens County v. FuturewiseCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.