Legal Opinion

Rogerson Hiller Corp. v. Port of Port Angeles

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 20, 1999No. 22064-4-IIPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Michael Rogerson is the sole shareholder of Rogerson Aircraft Corporation (RAC). RAC, in turn, is the sole shareholder in several related aircraft corporations. One of these corporations, Aerocomposites, leased space from the Port of Port Angeles. The Port ousted Aero-composites when it failed to make lease payments. The Port also seized equipment in the leased space and, after obtaining a judgment for back rent, scheduled a sheriffs sale of the equipment. At the sale, a representative of Rog-erson announced to the assembled crowd that the equip ment was actually owned by Aerobond, another…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Miotke v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wright v. DAVE JOHNSON INS. INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. All Around Underground, Inc. v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Impoundment of Chevrolet TruckWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Recall of LindquistWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Microsoft Corporation v. Motorola MobilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API