Legal Opinion

National Family Insurance v. Bunton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1993No. C1-93-993PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

After accepting settlement payments from an alleged tortfeasor’s liability insurer, appellants sought uninsured motorist benefits from respondents. The trial court concluded that appellants were not entitled to recover uninsured motorist benefits because appellants had already settled with the alleged tortfeasor’s liability carrier. We affirm.

FACTS

Gerald Bunton, Donna Bougie and Jaclyn Bauman were passengers in a ear driven by Brian Hickerson when the car hit a telephone pole. Liquid fertilizer spilled on the road contributed to the accident. An investigation suggested…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Seaway Port Authority of Duluth v. Midland Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Rister Ex Rel. Rister v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'Shaughnessy v. Smuckler Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Kabanuk Diversified Investments, Inc. v. Credit General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Vierkant Ex Rel. Johnson v. AMCO Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Northland Insurance Co. v. Continental Western Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. American Commerce Insurance Brokers, Inc. v. Minnesota Mutual Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API