Legal Opinion
Vierkant Ex Rel. Johnson v. AMCO Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 6, 1996No. C5-95-1651, C2-95-1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS G. FORSBERG, Judge *
Respondents challenge the district court’s decision that the insurer is not required to indemnify insureds for bodily injury claims raised by another insured. Appellant challenges the district court’s decision requiring it to indemnify insureds for “loss of services” and “required care” claims made by a non-insured.
FACTS
Jason Vierkant (age four) and his half-brother, Darren Kaiser (age seven), resided part-time with their mother, Darlene Kaiser, and part-time with Jason’s father, Kevin Vierkant. Kevin Vierkant is not related to Darren Kaiser.
On July 1, 1991,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Hume v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Canadian Universal Insurance Co. v. Fire Watch, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moore v. EwingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Flora v. Firepond, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2003
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bahr-RennerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Courtney Godfrey v. State Farm Fire and CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- Nodak Mutual Ins. Co. v. KollerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.