Legal Opinion
Magill v. Lewis
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1958No. 4070PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
Appellant Magill, a licensed contractor in the State of Nevada, and appellant Wright, a licensed contractor in the State of California, entered into a contract with respondents for the construction of a casino, bar and restaurant building at Lake Tahoe in the Sierra Nevada mountains, within the State of Nevada, but fairly close to the California line, for the sum of approximately $130,000. The first cause of action in the complaint in the court below was for the balance of some $12,000 due on the contract. The second cause of action is based on fraud. It…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Grant v. WeatherholtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Wilson v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Parman v. PetriccianiNevada Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- In Re Amerco Derivative LitigationNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. DoddsNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Sumner Development Corporation v. ShiversAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Locken v. LockenNevada Supreme Court · 1982
- Nevada Equities, Inc. v. Willard Pease Drilling Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1968
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.