Woods v. Bank of Haywards
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. F. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This action was commenced to obtain an injunction, perpetually restraining the defendant, a tenant of the plaintiff, from removing a vault from the premises described in the complaint. The court denied the injunction, and rendered judgment in favor of the defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and also from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
In 1891 the Bank of Haywards, defendant, went into possession of the premises under a written lease, which provided that the bank might at any time remove any improvements erected or placed by it upon the demised premises, including…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Moody v. AikenTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Wadman v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Zippar v. ReppySupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Dostal v. McCaddonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- San Diego Trust & Savings Bank v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Trabue Pittman Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Knox v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- McComish v. KaufmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.