Legal Opinion
McComish v. Kaufman
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 10, 1919No. Civ. No. 2024PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ELLISON, P. J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover possession of 235 opera-chairs, a lot of scenery, stage fixtures, and an electric sign. Prom a judgment in favor of defendant the plaintiff appeals.
On the twelfth day of March, 1912, the plaintiff gave to the defendant a lease of a room in a building in the town of Colusa, known as the “Herald Building,” to be used for the purpose of moving-picture entertainments. At the time the lease was executed, the defendant was in possession of the premises and had been for some time under prior contract with plaintiff. The lease was for a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Nunez v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Walberg v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Woods v. Bank of HaywardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Cowan v. Their CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hanrahan-Wilcox Corp. v. Jenison MacHinery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- Santa Clara Properties Co. v. R. L. C., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Inner Shoe Tire Co. v. TondroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.