Katzenmeier v. Oppenlander
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Kail and Rebecca J. Katzenmeier appeal from a summary judgment granted in favor of Lysle R. Oppenlander on their intentional and negligent misrepresentation claims. They argue that the trial court misinterpreted and misapplied a factually similar *260case, McLellan v. Raines, 36 Kan. App. 2d 1, 140 P.3d 1034 (2006), or, alternatively, that McLellan was wrongly decided. Nevertheless, because the Katzenmeiers waived their right to rely on Oppenlander’s representations and relied on their own inspections, summary judgment was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm.
The Katzenmeiers’ primary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mahler v. Keenan Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Korytkowski v. City of OttawaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Alires v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Brennan v. KunzleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Boegel v. Colorado Nat'l Bank of DenverCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Osterhaus v. TothCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
- Osterhaus v. SchunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Newcastle Homes, LLC v. ThyeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Daggett v. Board of Public UtilitiesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.