Legal Opinion

Boegel v. Colorado Nat'l Bank of Denver

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1993No. 67,783PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*547White, J.:

Jack D. Boegel appeals the jury’s denial of his claim of fraudulent concealment in the purchase of a farm containing 21 center-pivot irrigation systems. Boegel claims the Colorado National Bank of Denver (Bank) wrongfully withheld information concerning defects in the irrigation wells on the farm. Boegel claims the trial court erroneously denied his motion for directed verdict and also erroneously instructed the jury on the elements of fraudulent concealment.

Boegel is an experienced irrigation, farmer who had operated a center-pivot irrigated farm in Colorado since 1976. Also- an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moore v. State Bank of BurdenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. DuShane v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  3. Apperson v. Security State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Griffith v. Byers Construction Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. Fox v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  2. Alires v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Williamson v. AmraniSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  4. Brennan v. KunzleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  5. Britvic Soft Drinks Ltd. v. ACSIS Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API