Legal Opinion

Stechschulte v. Jennings

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 2013No. 100,648PublishedCited by 159 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Beier, J.:

The core issue of this appeal is the legal effect of a “Buyer Acknowledgment” in a residential real estate sellers disclosure form. Does it limit or destroy the buyer s ability to pursue the seller, the seller s agent, and the agent’s brokerage firm for breach of contract, fraudulent inducement and fraud by silence, negligent misrepresentation, and/or violations of the Kansas Consumer Protection Act (KCPA)? As we detail below, our resolution of this question picks up where we left off in Osterhaus v. Toth, 291 Kan. 759, 249 P.3d 888 (2011),…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Glenn v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  2. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  3. Cooke v. GillespieSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  4. Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by159 opinions

  1. Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. Phillip v. Marsh-MonsantoSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  3. Rinehart v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  5. BHC Development, L.C. v. Bally Gaming, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2013

154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API